Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball. Please download, read and share my new FREE ebook: 2.

Earth is Not Tilting, Wobbling, Rotating, Revolving, Spinning, Turning, Moving, Not a Ball, Sphere, Globe, Earth is Flat! 2014年2月 代理店一覧に、有限会社白馬ヤマトヤが追加されました。 詳しくはこちら 2013年12月 西尾家具工芸社ショールーム.

Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball! PDF  This 3. 5 page ebook full of photographs and diagrams is the perfect tool to help spark conversation and awaken your friends and family to the mother of all conspiracies.  Please make copies, print, distribute, re- upload and do everything you can to get this most important information out to the masses! Download from the link above or read the entire thing online below: 1) The horizon always appears perfectly flat 3. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 2. Only NASA and other government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos. 2) The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it. 3) The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here.

But since Earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense. Rivers run down to sea- level finding the easiest course, North, South, East, West and all other intermediary directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were truly a spinning ball then many of these rivers would be impossibly flowing uphill, for example the Mississippi in its 3. Gulf of Mexico. 5) One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles with a fall of only one foot. Parts of the West African Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement of the ball- Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and sometimes down. This would also be the case for the Parana, Paraguay and other long rivers.

If Earth were a ball 2. NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Every time such experiments have been conducted, however, standing water has proven to be perfectly level. Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. Canals, railways, bridges and tunnels for example are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles without any allowance for curvature.

1. Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get.
2. Btw Wing here’s d “A fistful of stances 鐵馬尋橋” by Kevin Cheng in full: A fistful of stances Watch, listen n dl Song in full: http://v.youku.com/v_show/id.
3. Express Helpline- Get answer of your question fast from real experts.
4. BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard.
5. Blog com histÓrias,biografias e fotos dos maiores artistas,locais e cultura do reggae,jamaica,África e do mundo inteiro. jah bless!

The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea is 1. When constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 2. Engineer, W. Winckler was published in the Earth Review regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books.

No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this - that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 3. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 6. The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 1.

Watch The Armstrong Lie Mediafire Download

London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 2.

If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 1. Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,4. London and Liverpool. A surveyor and engineer of thirty years published in the Birmingham Weekly Mercury stated, “I am thoroughly acquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering. Watch Ridge War Z Online Hollywoodreporter.

However bigoted some of our professors may be in the theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it is well known amongst us that such theoretical measurements are INCAPABLE OF ANY PRACTICAL ILLUSTRATION. All our locomotives are designed to run on what may be regarded as TRUE LEVELS or FLATS. There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and there, but they are always accurately defined and must be carefully traversed.

But anything approaching to eight inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance, COULD NOT BE WORKED BY ANY ENGINE THAT WAS EVER YET CONSTRUCTED. Taking one station with another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that all the platforms are ON THE SAME RELATIVE LEVEL.

The distance between Eastern and Western coasts of England may be set down as 3. If the prescribed curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon three miles higher than a chord drawn from the two extremities. If such was the case there is not a driver or stoker within the Kingdom that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit for such venturesome exploits, as running trains round spherical curves. Watch Mega Shark Vs. Mecha Shark Putlocker.

Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse, and with our rolling stock constructed as at present physically impossible.”1. The Manchester Ship Canal Company published in the Earth Review stated, “It is customary in Railway and Canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out Public Works to make allowances for the curvature of the earth. In a 1. 9th century French experiment by M. M. Biot and Arago a powerful lamp with good reflectors was placed on the summit of Desierto las Palmas in Spain and able to be seen all the way from Camprey on the Island of Iviza.

Since the elevation of the two points were identical and the distance between covered nearly 1. Earth were a ball 2. The Lieutenant- Colonel Portlock experiment used oxy- hydrogen Drummond’s lights and heliostats to reflect the sun’s rays across stations set up across 1. St. George’s Channel. If the Earth were actually a ball 2.

Portlock’s light should have remained hidden under a mile and a half of curvature. If the Earth were truly a sphere 2. Otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 3. The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around.

By first filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was already coming in the correct angle with no change necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct. Olber’s Paradox” states that if there were billions of stars which are suns the night sky would be filled completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star.” In fact Olber’s “Paradox” is no more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a “failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the heliocentric spinning ball model. The Michelson- Morley and Sagnac experiments attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to Earth’s assumed motion through space.